Potatoes, fat spreads and eggs are not as bad as you think and might actually be healthy, new research has found.
With fast changing nutritional guidelines, it is difficult to keep
track of the latest health trend but a new study based on both old and
current science breaks the stereotypes of what you should and shouldn't
eat.
Nutritional sciences lecturer at King's College London Scott
Harding re-assessed the health benefits of five food, known as the
"villains" in a healthy diet.
Eggs
Eggs were long-believed to be bad for your heart.
A large egg contains 185mg of dietary cholesterol, which was believed to contribute to high blood cholesterol levels.
But for the last 20 years, research has shown a normal intake of
dietary cholesterol has very little influence on a person’s blood
cholesterol levels.
Now, nutrition experts are putting the record straight arguing eggs
are a source of protein, healthy fats, and several vitamins and
minerals.
Fat spreads
Fat spreads such as margarine and butter have had a confusing nutritional history.
Margarine, which is made of vegetable fat, has been used in most
developed countries since the mid 19th Century to replace butter.
The new spread was made popular by being cheaper than butter and
sales were driven by advice from health professionals, who recommended
eating less saturated fat to prevent heart diseases.As a result, trans fat-free margarine hit the market.
But confusion over whether vegetable fat spreads are safe to eat seemed to have remained.
As long as "partially hydrogenated vegetable oil” is not listed as an
ingredient, then these spreads are safe to eat. They enable to avoid
dietary saturated fat and reduced the risk of coronary heart disease.
Potatoes
Potatoes are one of the few vegetables considered to be unhealthy
because of their high glycemic index and are often associated with food
made from refined carbohydrates - and therefore to avoid.
But potatoes are a rich source of carbohydrates, vitamin C, some B
vitamins and trace minerals.The preparing and cooking of potatoes can
also influence the aspects of the starches for the better.
Cooking and cooling potatoes increases the amount of resistant starch
in the potatoes, which “resists” digestion in the gut, potentially
having a positive impact on your gut bacteria.
Dairy
Once a staple food in many people's diets, milk, butter, yoghurt and
cheese are no longer consumed to the same extent because of conflicting
health messages.
While dairy products contain high protein and calcium, which the body
needs, they need to be chosen with care as some products contain
high amounts of saturated fat per portion.
But although it is best to avoid a diet high in saturated fat, it is
not a bad thing to regularly consume dairy products as long as this is
part of reasonable calorie and fat intakes.
Raw nuts and nut butters
Some suggest nuts should be avoided by anyone trying to lose weight because they are high in fat and calories.
But research evidence show raw nuts are key to a healthy diet and
while maintaining body weight, they also help to reduce death from heart
disease and cardiac arrest.
Raw nuts contain protein, healthy fats, which are low in saturated fat, dietary fibre and micronutrients.
Peanut butter, can also be part of a healthy diet as a source of
protein, fibre, vitamin B6 and magnesium. Evidence from recent
research demonstrate peanut butter can increase weight loss if it is
used to replace less healthy protein sources such as processed meats.
High in calories, peanut butter yet needs to be consumed in moderation.
Mr Harding concludes: "All foods fit into a healthy diet. Don’t fall
into the trap of believing in 'superfoods' or 'food villains'.
Enthusiastic consumption of one particular 'superfood' can be worse than
consuming a so-called 'food villain'.
Last year, speaking in Singapore, David Cameron was forced to acknowledge that foreign investment in British housing stock was damaging to the housing market and provided a cover for illegal activities. He agreed to crack down on individuals and organisations using the mask of offshore companies to invest in the UK property market as a means to launder what he called “dirty money”. He described how London property was being snapped up with “plundered and laundered cash” and promised that the UK should not be a “safe haven for corrupt money”. But it wasn’t enough.
In making the speech, Cameron was responding to a growing realisation that, in ushering in foreign investment, the government had also welcomed in a wealthy elite that objected to transparency in its financial dealings. Did we really know what, or who, we were dealing with? More importantly, did we understand how significant an effect their secret spending with the global luxury real estate brokers of Mayfair was having on everyone else, right down to the family trying to buy a modest two-bedroom semi in Chelmsford?
UK property valued at a total of £170bn is held by overseas investors. Of course, not every purchase made by a company registered offshore is an attempt to launder dirty cash or conceal illegal activity. But buying a home through an offshore company structure is one way of escaping the taxes and costs of ownership which the rest of us all have to bear.
Now we know the scale of the influence these offshore sales are having, and it’s alarming. The Panama Papers, leaked this week, found that 2, 800 Mossack Fonseca companies are linked to the title deeds of 6, 000 properties in the UK, worth £7bn. It is estimated that 90, 000 homes in England and Wales are registered to overseas owners, the majority of which (75, 000 in total) are thought to be owned by companies registered within tax havens.
That looks like an awful lot of property tax dodging and wealth hoarding to me.
Wealthy elites, purchasing high end residential and commercial property, have pushed up the prices of housing for everyone. In the city centre, global high rollers compete aggressively for prime space, the solid investments that can weather a global financial crisis – and even a predicted future downturn. The fight pushes up the price, but when you’re finding ways to sidestep all the financial obligations that go with buying a home, perhaps that doesn’t matter quite so much. The buyers keep on coming.
The lack of property tax returns to the Treasury over the last decade is in part (though not entirely) to blame for the lack of money available to invest in new housing at affordable prices. Cameron and the Treasury attempted to deal with this sleight of hand by introducing charges on properties owned through offshore vehicles, but it might be too little too late. A consultation on whether to force buyers to disclose their identities won’t unpick the damage done.
For, elsewhere in the capital, the housing market is already distorted by this influx of foreign cash. While the international elite leave the apartments of central London sitting empty – a literal shell - the otherwise wealthy move towards the capital’s fringes. Even in zones three and four, the greener suburbs, even at the comparatively (though, frankly, not at all) modest level of a three bedroom family home, the housing market is now controlled by the cash buyer.
What hope for an ordinary household, requiring two incomes to repay a mortgage? Even with a major deposit of, say, 40 per cent, the buyer with the readies will always take precedence. That causes a ripple effect. According to analysts at the Centre for Economics and Business Research, house price growth in the south east of England is predicted to hit 8.3 per cent, compared with just 5.8 per cent in London. For the elite, the costs are being capped; the clampdown from Cameron and his government might be weeding out the worst influences, but the rush to buy up London has already had its effect.
The cost of housing for ordinary Britons is creeping up and up. For many, the chances of ever owning their own home now look slim. A huge shift of life expectations is taking place.
Yesterday we learned that private renting is now cheaper than repaying a mortgage in half of British cities. That’s the case because mortgages are so hard to secure, and properties so expensive and hard to find.
But with rents still rising, that’s little succour to those who have no choice but to accept that they’ll be renting for life, thanks to the malign influence of the selfish hoarders who make up the 0.1 per cent.